How is academic motivation in children influenced by emotional regulation?

Rosanna Pengelly

Abstract


Children’s academic achievement is influenced by motivation. Motivation, in turn, is affected by emotional regulation and children’s reactions to poor or high achievement. This study investigated academic motivation to gain an understanding of the attributions (effort, ability, difficulty and luck) made by children on their achievements in a maths test among 25 SEN children (i.e., children with emotional, behavioural and social difficulties) and 44 mainstream children. SEN children made more attributions to effort whereas mainstream children made more attributions to ability. Emotional regulation was measured using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Emotional reappraisal (i.e., reinterpreting the meaning of emotional stimuli) and suppression (i.e., a person’s knowledge of their emotions) did not differ between schools. Results highlight differences in expectations of achievement between schools: Mainstream children, unlike SEN children, were more likely to want to hide their paper with the results of the maths test despite achieving higher scores in the test. This research expands knowledge of the difference in achievement attributions between academic contexts. This topic should be studied further to ultimately raise the academic motivations of SEN and mainstream children alike.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206.

Brown, J. & Weiner, B. (1984). Affective consequences of ability versus effort ascriptions: Controversies, resolutions, and quandaries. American Psychological Association.

Curby, T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. & Abry, T. (2013). Do Emotional Support and Classroom Organization Earlier in the Year Set the Stage for Higher Quality Instruction? Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), 557–569.

Donnellan, M., Trzesniewski, K., Robins, R., Moffitt, T. & Caspi, A. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological science, 16(4), 328--335.

Dweck, C., Chiu, C. & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgements and Reactions: A World From Two Perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.

Evans, G., & Stecker, R. (2004). Motivational consequences of environmental stress. Journal Of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 143-165.

Gross, J.J. & John, O.P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.

Guindon, M.H. (2002). Toward Accountability in the Use of the Self‐Esteem Construct. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(2), 204-214.

Gullone, E., & Taffe, J. (2012). The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ–CA): A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 409-417.

Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C., Lin, D. & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588.

Jarvenoja, H. & Jarvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 463-481.

McLeod, S.A. (2012). Low Self Esteem. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/self-esteem.html

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.

Pajares, F. & Schunk, D. (2001). The development of academic self-efficacy. Development of achievement motivation. United States, 7.

Pulla, V., Shatté, A., & Warren, S. (2013).Perspectives on Coping and Resilience. Delhi: Authors Press.

Rosenberg, M. & Owens, T.J. (2001). Low self-esteem people: A collective portrait. In T.J. Owens. S. Stryker, & N. Goodmann (Eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research, 400-436. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General And Applied, 80(1), 1-28.

Schanding, G. & Nowell, K. (2013). Universal Screening for Emotional and Behavioral Problems: Fitting a Population-Based Model. Journal Of Applied School Psychology, 29(1), 104-119.

Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.

Schunk, D.H. & Gunn, T.P. (1986). Self-efficacy and skill development: Influence of task strategies and attributions. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 238-244.

Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning, 1-30. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stipek, D. & Gralinski, J. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 361.

Stormont, M. & Reinke, W. (2013). Implementing Tier 2 Social Behavioral Interventions: Current Issues, Challenges, and Promising Approaches. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29(2), 121-125.

Sylva, K. (1992). Conversations in the nursery: how they contribute to aspirations and plans. Language and Education, 6, 141-148.

Sylva, K. (1994). School Influences on Children's Development. Journal Of Child Psychology And Psychiatry, 35(1), 135-170.

Weiner, B. (1979). A Theory of Motivation for Some Classroom Experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3-25.

Winne, P. H. & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551–572.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

ISSN 1754-2383 [Online] ©University of Plymouth